2007 Braves Projections

by Eli Greenspan on Jan 7, 2007 4:31 PM EST

C Brian McCann
.312 AVG, 29 HR, 93 RBI
1B Adam LaRoche
.281 AVG, 35 HR, 104 RBI
2B Martin Prado
.268 AVG, 6 HR, 38 RBI
3B Chipper Jones
.296 AVG, 25 HR, 78 RBI
SS Edgar Renteria
.288 AVG, 12 HR, 67 RBI
*LF Ryan Langerhans
.265 AVG, 10 HR, 53 RBI
CF Andruw Jones
.280 AVG, 48 HR, 121 RBI
RF Jeff Francoeur
.271 AVG, 28 HR, 94 RBI

*LF Matt Diaz
.289 AVG, 10 HR, 55 K

P John Smoltz
14-8 W-L, 3.78 ERA, 182 K
P Tim Hudson
11-11 W-L, 4.23 ERA, 119 K
P Mike Hampton
6-11 W-L, 4.26 ERA, 84 K
P Chuck James
12-9 W-L, 4.08 ERA, 115 K
P Kyle Davies
8-10 W-L, 4.74 ERA, 98 K

NOTE: THIS IS A TENTATIVE PROJECTION, SUBJECT TO CHANGE

Tweet Comment 9 comments | 0 recs |

Do you like this story?

Comments

WE NEED PITCHING

by Anonymous on Jan 7, 2007 5:17 PM EST reply actions

Hampton will have an ERA around 4 I believe and I think Davies is capable of a 4.5-.47 Remember he had groin surgery last year and it wasnt 100%

by Anonymous on Jan 7, 2007 5:23 PM EST reply actions

I will recalculate both of them

by Eli on Jan 7, 2007 5:38 PM EST reply actions

I think Diaz should be starting in LF and Cormier should be SP over Davies

by Chief Tomahawk on Jan 7, 2007 10:03 PM EST reply actions

ill do cormier projection tomorrow

by Eli on Jan 7, 2007 10:18 PM EST reply actions

Smoltz might have more strikeouts than that... He had quite a few this year...

by Anonymous on Jan 7, 2007 10:53 PM EST reply actions

for the guy that said these projections were bad, they are actually very accurate. I work over at another fantasy site and the guys I work with rave over his projections and are even comparing them to ares before we publish them.

by Anonymous on Jan 8, 2007 1:24 AM EST reply actions

I'm interested in seeing the Royals new team's projections. Will they be added? when?

by Anonymous on Jan 8, 2007 1:48 PM EST reply actions

I think those are some pretty high numbers for McCann. Last year was by far the best offensive year he's ever had, including the minors. A more conervative (realistic) projection is something like .280 16 70

by Anonymous on Jan 8, 2007 3:57 PM EST reply actions