Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How Not To Criticize Tom Brady For The Patriots' Loss

Blue Jays set to deal Michael Taylor?

The Blue Jays are reportedly poised to swing top prospect Michael Taylor, who was recently acquired from the Phillies in the Roy Halladay deal, to the A's for top prospect Brett Wallace.

Neither side would comment on the issue, but Beane wouldn't go as far as to deny the whole deal.

"We're not in position to comment right now," Beane told Bay Area News Group.

The A's have a lot of depth at the corner infield positions, especially after landing 3B Jake Fox from the Cubs, who is expected to be in the teams Opening Day lineup. Adding Taylor gives them a player with just as much upside, and can be slotted into an outfield spot when ready to go. 

 

In two minor league seasons, Wallace is a .302 career hitter with 34 home runs. He has the potential to hit for 20-30 home runs once he reaches the major leagues.

Taylor, 23, is .312 career hitter with 45 home runs and a .383 OBP in three minor league seasons. He also has the potential to hit for power in the major leagues. 

There is no timetable for an announcement of the deal. 

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think that the bigger thing to take away from this is that the team plans on having Daric Barton around long-term, because otherwise it wouldn’t have been surprising to Wallace up at first base for Oakland at some point in 2010.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Oakland had a Carter/Sweeney/Taylor outfield by 2011, unless they just bring up Carter and DH him, which generally isn’t the route that most teams take.

by Satchel Price on Dec 16, 2009 9:38 AM EST reply actions  

I agree

Daric Bartons slash line last season was nothing that screams of a great player though. .413 slugging with a .784 OPS? Wallace would have crushed those numbers.

My halloween costume: the Indiana secondary iPhone- no matter how much you want to love it, you know the coverage area sucks.
-ChronicHoosier

by Taskmaster on Dec 16, 2009 6:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Does either team win? Or is it a good trade for both based on needs and potential?

by Belligerent Burkie on Dec 16, 2009 2:28 PM EST reply actions  

It's a win for the A's

They have a glut at 1b/DH (Where Wallace would have landed eventually), and got a pretty good OF out of it.

The A’s get some power and I guess they have the need, so it’s not really a loss, but Taylor was still a need for them.

My halloween costume: the Indiana secondary iPhone- no matter how much you want to love it, you know the coverage area sucks.
-ChronicHoosier

by Taskmaster on Dec 16, 2009 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

MLB Daily Dish: the best and most reliable clearinghouse for MLB Trade Rumors from credible sources, covering every signing, transaction, and trade, with a heavy dose of analysis and fan reaction you can't get anywhere else. Enjoy!

FanPosts

Follow us on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter!


Managing Editor:

Jbopp-kc_small Justin Bopp

Reporting:

Dme_small Satchel Price

Dsc00490_-_version_2_small Jason Hunt

Lax-xl_small Marisa Ingemi

Carlosicon_small Julian Levine

George_small Ronit Shah

Featuring:

Pic3_small Craig M Williams

Small adam bernacchio

Bio_pic_small Patterson_B

001_small Jeff Kleiner