It's not me, it's you... Time for a change baseball
It seems like nine out of every ten people I talk to think baseball is boring. Actually, nine out of every ten sports fans I talk to think baseball is boring, everyone else can barely stand it. The number one complaint is that the game is too slow and too long. This is true. Most people with a life don’t have four hours to watch a game. Most people who don’t have a life don’t have the time either. The reality is, not much can be done to change the pace of the game. Even if there was, I don’t think the powers that be would care to change a thing, as change and Major League Baseball don’t exactly go hand in hand. So, if you can’t do anything about the game itself, what can be done to make the league more interesting. Here’s a few suggestions that would make the baseball season much more fun and help the league reach more fans.
1. Shorten the season: In late winter when the baseball season is about to start, my girlfriend always says the same thing to me – “I can’t believe baseball is starting already.” Even though she doesn’t know much about sports, she has a great point. Baseball is a summer game, the season starts too early and ends way to late. 162 games is way to long. Players get injured and fans lose interest, that’s why I think the season should be 120 games at the most. The season could start two weeks later than it usually does, and would end towards the end of august, a week before the start of the NFL season. With less games, division races would be tighter, which would keep teams in the playoff hunt longer, which bring me to my next point.
2. Add more teams to the playoffs: The good thing about the NBA and NHL is that about half of the teams make the playoffs every year. Why should things be any different in baseball? Imagine how pissed off you’d be after playing 162 games, and then your team missed the playoffs by a game or two. It never made sense to me why the league with the most regular season games, had the least amount of playoff teams. I suggest having a similar playoff format to the NBA and NHL – 16 total teams, but instead of eight teams from the American League and eight from the National League, the six division winners would make it in, followed by the next ten best teams regardless of whether they play in the AL or NL. The teams would be seeded 1 to 16, with the first two round being a best out of five series, and the final two going to the traditional best out of seven. Changing to this style of playoff format would increase fan interest not only during the post season, but during the regular season as well, due to more teams having the chance to make the playoffs.
3. Add the DH to the National League: It’s usually considered an automatic out when the pitcher comes to the plate. Remember how funny Randy Johnson looked trying to swing a bat? Pitching and hitting are two different jobs; pitchers should stick to the mound and stay out of the batters box. Another reason why pitchers shouldn’t hit – they suck at it. Pitchers are the most active players in the game, and they shouldn’t have to worry about hitting. The major pro of changing the DH rule in the NL would be more offense. Also, it would limit the risk of injury and create an extra roster spot for someone.
In the post steroid era there’s no better time to make changes like this to. Will any of these happen over the next few years? Maybe, but probably not. Like the game itself, Major League Baseball is very slow when it comes to change. The one major rule change that MLB has made over the past few seasons has been awarding home field advantage to the winning league in the All-Star game. Most fans will agree that this is one of the most idiotic rules in all of sports.
There would be a few major roadblocks in making these changes – Money and Baseball Purist. A shorter regular season would mean less money for owners, but some of that would be made up through an extended playoffs. Baseball purist will argue that shortening the season and extending the playoffs would have a bad affect on the record books. Aren’t the record books already destroyed thanks to the PED use of the last two decades?
The new generation of sports fan would love to see a little bit more of variety in baseball, and that’s why I think these rules would have a very positive impact on the game. For the most part, the sport in very predictable, but expanding the playoffs would give more teams a chance at winning a championship. If Major League Baseball is interested in expanding its fan base, it should consider rules like this. Let’s face it – the sport of baseball will always be slow, but that doesn’t mean it has to be boring.
Joe Osborne
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
I live in nevada and i say baseball is boring to watch on television but it's quite
relaxing to goto a game. whether it be triple a or major league game. for the gambling public most of us just complain after basketball seaon is over that we have to wait 70+ days to first game in college football.
I'm all about covering the spread and moneylines. Craig Thompson just might end up being a savvy guy if he gets the MWC to 12 teams. Hell is just a word, the reality is much much worse." Event Horizon". Now remember, when things look bad and it looks like you're not gonna make it, then you gotta get mean, I mean plumb, mad dog mean. cause if you lose your head and you give up then you neither live or win. That's just the way it is. "The Outlaw Josey Wales". To protect the sheep you gotta catch the wolf, and it takes a wolf to catch a wolf. "Training Day". Rashad will beat Rua b/c it's a bad matchup for him. 2/1 odds. Josh Koscheck will dethrone Gsp and win the welterweight title. 2.9/1 odds on that too. Peace.
by wolfmanshowlforever on Jun 19, 2010 5:36 PM EDT reply actions
This is a very good post
And it’s hard to fault most of the logic. Usually, you’ll read articles about changing baseball and you’ll wish sports writers still used typewriters so you could beat him with it. But you’re point about the sport with the most number of regular season games having the smallest playoff structure is a very good one.
I think the main roadblock is the congruency of the records over the years. I mean, maybe tinker with your playoff structure a bit, but not a bad plan overall.
Also…NO GAMES IN NOVEMBER!
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
Major League Baseball: It's not hockey, it's not the NBA
Playoffs in MLB have never been a good idea, especially with the way a bad moment can negate an entire season. I recall Derek Lee making an error in a Cubs playoff game, and an outstanding season by the Cubs went down the drain, based on an untimely single error.
Here is the solution, based on the American League (14 teams). Even schedule, 130 games. Each team in the AL plays every other team ten times, five at home, five away. At the end of 130 games, at the end of August, on the 31st, the six teams with the best records at the end of 130 games now enter a category of “Super September”.
The Six Best Teams: For another thirty games (three at home, three away) those six teams play only each other, to determine, at the end of September, who goes to the World Series. No playoffs, other than Super September. On October 3, the World Series starts. The final game of the 160-game season is September 30th. The eight “also-ran” teams who finished below the six “Super September” teams, they only play each other, and perhaps interleague games, for thirty newly-scheduled games. They call up rookies, expand their rosters, etc.
Try mapping it out, with real teams. Take the standings overall for the AL (get rid of divisions!) as of August 31, 2009, and map out the Super September teams, and who they will be playing. It’s pretty exciting to think about thirty games all with playoff intensity. And it does justice to a long season. In a five-game “playoff”, if you win one game as a visitor out of the first two, you almost have a psychological lock on winning the series. And one game can hinge on one misplayed fly ball (Holliday). Minnesota only got to play the Yankees, who they could not beat, in 2009. They had lost how many straight games to the Yankees?? What kind of “post-season” is three games??!!
The World Series would be a traditional seven game series in the first ten days of October. None of this snowfall, forty-degree games….that’s greed, not baseball!!
Blez: Most folks seem to believe that the big flaw with the 2010 Oakland A's will be the lack of any power.
Beane: They believe it because it's true.
by One won lost won on Jun 26, 2010 11:04 PM EDT reply actions
A little much...
I’m all for changing the playoff format, but I think this would be a little drastic. I do like the 130 game schedule though. It evens out the playing field for above average teams like the Blue Jays who are stuck playing the Yanks, Sox and Rays for a huge chunk of their schedule every season.
Until baseball brings in some type of salary cap, the scheduling will probably be unfair. It would be nice to see all teams play an even amount of games against teams in their league.
by TheJoeOsborne on Jun 29, 2010 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions
Good point.
Thanks for adding to the conversation.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
This is the worst thing ever
The DH is an abomination. If you’re not going to let the pitcher hit, why not let any player hit? Have a defense and an offense! Most teams try and find a catcher who can play either offense or defense really well, why not split them up entirely! The pitcher is part of the team and needs to hit, having it any other way is retarded, not to mention how the DH takes all of the managerial strategy the game has. It’s just terrible
I like the 162 games per season, if they were to shorten it, it shouldn’t be any less than 150 something. And finally, adding teams to the playoffs? The NBA is unwatchable because so many mediocre teams get in the playoffs. The only change they should make to the playoffs is have the best four teams in each league, not necessarily the division winners and a wild card.
DH rule is better
The reason for the DH in my opinion is to let the pitcher rest. The pitcher is far more active than any other player on the field (catcher would probably be close). Plus, the DH adds more offense to the game. In my opinion I think fans prefer more offense.
Adding more teams to the playoffs would give more of the smaller market teams a chance to make a run at things and make things more interesting in October.
Having a shorter schedule would limit injuries and wear and tear which would improve the quality of play in the playoffs.
by TheJoeOsborne on Jun 29, 2010 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions

by 











